If the bitesizer doesn't comment it automtically seems to me, as he/she just looks around the 'Newest' section and bitesizing everything of what he/she 'thinks' is good. I'm not even sure, if those anonymos bitesizers even play the map. Maybe this is a vague statement, but who knows?
Moreover, if one o my maps get bitesized, and i don't even know by who (i was in such a situation twice) i don't know if it was a 'serious' bitesizer or just someone who won his bitesize abilities in a raffle.
If I bitesized a map (I have no bitesize rights by the way) which reasons would i have not to say anything about it?

is a figure of authority on numa.notdot.net. He allows the best of the best to be bitesized and put in a special section, and I believe if he "thinks" it's the best of the best, he has the responsibility of saying why.

The bitesizer deserves anonymity just as much as the voter does.

I personally comment every map I bitesize just because I like to explain myself, but why isn't it required for the bitesizer to comment the map he/she bitesizes?

I think they MUST comment or risk the removal of bitesize privileges.

Turtle's reasons were enough.

And maybe it shouldn't be bitesized either (I'm not the sizer) but it doesn't deserve a 2/5.

3.5/5 from me.

This got bitesized? After all of that? o_O

sorry, man

It all fell apart starting at the regular doors and the thwump.

1. You placed the gold after the drones. That looks messy. I used to do it also, so no sweat there.
2. Random doors that look messy. I didn't like those.
3. The laser drone and gauss were just there and made the map worse.
4. None of the thwumps were really that great.
5. The little one way trick to get the key to the locked doors was quite annoying. Overused, just a waste of loading time.
6. The thing in and around the doors was messy.
7. The tileset was quite alright, though
8. The beginning was also very fun.

Bascially, edit out the one ways, the laser drone, and the gauss, and add in more zap drones, and make the thwumps better and more purposeful, and this could get a 5.

But it didnt. Sorry.