When Everything Falls
Author | RadiumFalcon |
---|---|
Tags | action author:radiumfalcon generic rated rf-castle |
Created | 2008-12-29 |
Last Modified | 2009-01-02 |
Rating |
3 by 17 people.
|
Map Data | |
Description |
Other maps by this author
Comments
Pages: (0)
2008-12-31
"...didn't make since..."?
AHAHAHA. Though I have no respect for you, you can really make me want to argue more. That relieves stress, so thanks.
Learn to just drop it. And this could have easily gotten a four also if he used the map rating thread. You see?
"Stop trying to hide half the information, you already rated it 0"
What? When did I hide information? When did I say I didnt rate this a 0. You arent even making since now.
"Stop trying to hide half the information, you already rated it 0"
What? When did I hide information? When did I say I didnt rate this a 0. You arent even making since now.
2008-12-31
Obviously helped him
Rated 4 now, you noticed? Stop trying to hide half the information, you already rated it 0.
2008-12-31
He should feel bad about resubmiting,
because there are much better resources to use. You care about peoples well being? I think the flaimbating prick would disagree on that one. At least I use more intelligent words then calling people pricks and swearing.
Im sorry RF Ive just tried to get people to stop resubbing because it really doesnt help anything in my opinion, this coming from somebody that used to constantly resub. It never helped me and I dont think it will help you. So, I hope you wont resub in the future but if you do I wont react to it as bad as this time. We cool?
Im sorry RF Ive just tried to get people to stop resubbing because it really doesnt help anything in my opinion, this coming from somebody that used to constantly resub. It never helped me and I dont think it will help you. So, I hope you wont resub in the future but if you do I wont react to it as bad as this time. We cool?
2008-12-30
I love that
song.
2008-12-30
No.
You just rated it a zero to make him feel bad about resubmitting. In fact, I'd say that's a snipe. Normal NUMA-ators don't 0 people's maps for resubbing. Just seems like you pulled a Bupo and you want a reaction. If I had the same feelings about resubbing, I wouldn't rate this map a 0. I actually care about people's well being on this website, and I don't give out 0's for no reason.
Maybe you and your idiocy can work this one out.
Maybe you and your idiocy can work this one out.
2008-12-30
Whats your problem?
Would you rather have me give it a 0 then not say why? I gave a legitimate reason. I wouldnt have given it a zero but he said that he would stop doing this and he wont. That is what really makes me mad.
2008-12-30
Yeah
I don't know anyone else who rates people's maps 0 for resubbing, or calling them plagerizing for that matter. You're just trying to be a flamebaiting prick.
2008-12-30
Good map..
Keeps you on your toes. 4/5
I try to find some demos and all I see is this debate. Sigh.. Page wasted.
I try to find some demos and all I see is this debate. Sigh.. Page wasted.
And no he re-subbed because he got bad ratings hardly because he wanted more. And as atob already said there are threads for getting more ratings and comments but radium falcon decided to take a way that gets people pissed off at him. I'm not the only person that is mad about people resubmitting. Almost any non-noob is against it.
And I had every right to rate this a 0. Plagiarism is a qualification for a zero, I said that already.
And I had every right to rate this a 0. Plagiarism is a qualification for a zero, I said that already.
You need to get involved in this thread [forum.therealn.com] by Jan 1st if you want to keep your reviewer status!
2008-12-30
As far as I'm concerned spudz
Resubmitting was never plagerized. He resubbed and delisted his other map so it's a moot point. It's not like he had both maps on the same page. He resubbed because he wanted to get more ratings on his map. And if you saw the same map yesterday, why come back to this one. I also don't know why you give a shit. You seem to have rated the act of him "PLAGERIZING" instead of actually rating the map.
You just want to satrt an argument, and you have no reason to rate this a 0. Think before you RCE.
You just want to satrt an argument, and you have no reason to rate this a 0. Think before you RCE.
2008-12-30
It has nothing to do with the analogy.
You still plagiarized and got a 0. But yah this is a very good excuse to be able to snipe any resubmitted maps. And will use it as much as I can.
2008-12-30
No way, didnt know.
You still plagiarized and that is one of the qualifications for giving a 0. And know duh this isnt a university or a administrator would have expelled you by now.
2008-12-30
Its possible to plagarize yourself.
In universities if you submit an essay that you used in another class and no changes were made then you can get expelled. So thats exactly what you did which warrants me to give you a 0.
2008-12-30
I will tell why we care.
Im sick of seeing the same map that I saw yesterday. Especially a very bad generic one that will most likely get bad ratings no matter how many times its submitted. Also coming from somebody who said that they would stop whining about ratings the last time they did this.
0
Since I have seen this exact map before you obviously plaegerized it.
0
Since I have seen this exact map before you obviously plaegerized it.
2008-12-29
2.5/5
A LOT of roughspots that disturbed the flow magnanimously. Some of the mines were placed right in the path of the ninja, usually in front of a door. The rocket to the very left was a BITCH (I emphasize bitch) cuz it was right in the middle of the room and got into the way of my jumping path to get the cluster of gold and it blasted me. Quite a nuisance. Placing a guass or even a chaingun would've made things easier and more flow-tendendant. Some of the corners of the tiles made the timing of some jump real snippy/specific. The flow of the map as a whole was average, but because of these 'disturbances' they decreased the flow and made the map less enjoyable for me.
2008-12-29
Also
Toning it down a bit, I dont think that it should matter if a map is resubbed or not. Surely it doesnt affect the quality?
2008-12-29
My thoughts on this haven't changed.
Still a 2/5
2008-12-29
As for the map
Pretty solid overall, liked the non-linearity but the gameplay seemed a little unrefined for me. Or rather just not to my tastes. 3.5 up still; I'm not going to let my personal play-style interfere with my ratings, considering the object placement and tile jumping is well calculated regardless.
2008-12-29
saw the epic title
then i had to change my song to through stuggle - as i lay dying. yeah it was intense the moment i started playing i thought this kid know what he's doing 4.5^
oh well, still a good map, 4
2008-12-29
Radium
you should use the comments/ratings threads, they do work if you get involved.
2008-12-29
you and originality
are a lost cause.
2008-12-29
I remember this
4
2008-12-29
Great objects
Pretty intense but replayable
4.5
4.5
2008-12-29
Relist?
Your desperate.
spudzalot
I was so silly when commenting on this. Oh the memories.