Forever Black
This map was featured on 2009-03-14
Some maps have amazing set-pieces to enthral the player. Some take a usually bland idea and give it the Midas touch. Some maps make superiority seem so simple in hindsight. This is not one of those maps.
It is the definitive map, taking all of these aspects together and melding them into an incredibly playable arena for the ninja to duck and dive over. The rockets are managed perfectly, looking intimidating yet exciting to the player, whilst being easy enough to evade to maintain the merriment.
Try this map once, and you’ll come forever back.
— Guitar_Hero_Matt
Other maps by this author
Comments
Pages: (0)
2009-03-25
wish i could give it a 0....
awful.
2009-03-15
Sub-900 AGD
.
Demo Data |
---|
2009-03-15
Oh dear, I should have given this more time.
I'm really sorry Mrgy. :/
2009-03-15
Oh, and btw
I enjoyed the map. It's a little rough around the edges, but I had a lark messing about with it.
2009-03-15
Featured Maps
are for whatever the author wants to feature, be it a 5/5 outstanding map, a 3/5 ok map but with a great base concept, an incomplete map with an interesting innovation, a tileset, an Nart, whatever.
Remembering that everyone has differing tastes, or opinions on what deserves attention, calling something not worthy of a feature is like telling that person what they enjoy is wrong or not good enough. It's arrogant and petty minded, and should be avoided.
Maximo said it all, twice now, you guys should pay more attention to the guy.
Remembering that everyone has differing tastes, or opinions on what deserves attention, calling something not worthy of a feature is like telling that person what they enjoy is wrong or not good enough. It's arrogant and petty minded, and should be avoided.
Maximo said it all, twice now, you guys should pay more attention to the guy.
2009-03-15
I agree with
both PNI and Maximo. A median combination of bitesizing and featuring would work best.
2009-03-14
i was under the impression
that the featured maps WERE a highly selective bitesize, because you can only have one a day
2009-03-14
Mustardude,
featuring is great because it allows the creation of the written word to be pounded into the heads of Numa-goers. Bitesizing is bleh.
2009-03-14
Why?
Why are you pigeon holing such a fantastic tool you guys have? Why on earth would you turn such a flexible fantastic opportunity and limit it to only be about "great maps"?
Do you see how you just turned a great tool into nothing more than a highly selective bitesize?
Do you see how you just turned a great tool into nothing more than a highly selective bitesize?
2009-03-14
Featuring is supposed to
show you maps that are great, but get little attention. Just sayin', not pointing anybody out.
2009-03-14
Ganteka
We agreed that I'd fill in any days where there weren't any other requests. Or at least, I made that statement and no-one disagreed. I'll be reviewing more just so the queeu doesn't stagnate, you should be thankful ;)
2009-03-14
I enjoyed playing this map
It was nice to look at, well laid out, and quite thoughtfully crafted. Fun.
2009-03-14
AGD
:) nice map
Demo Data |
---|
2009-03-14
great feature choice
but to be honest... can someone else besides GTM feature it?
Nothing against him and his choices, but it'd be nice to have some diversity
Nothing against him and his choices, but it'd be nice to have some diversity
2009-03-14
Maximo
The sad truth is that you can't really change everyone. Featuring has made NUMA more like politics than anything else. This is pretty stupid.
2009-03-14
And...
I'm sorry mrgy05. I don't want to hijack your map, it's a fun map and shouldn't have to listen to shit like this.
2009-03-14
The issue is
That comment is stupid. It's akin to saying "I wouldn't have made this map" on a map you don't like. I mean what does it do to improve the conversation of the community here on numa? It doesn't nothing. It's a zero value statement. Say what you don't like about the map, say what you would improve. For got sakes say anything about_the_map. The feature is to show you the map is out there so you can talk about the map, yet every feature that gets posted all I read about is why it wasn't worth the feature, or why the feature was written poorly, or this and that about the feature. You guys are so missing the point.
I mean you are willing to give the map a 4 right, so what makes it not feature worthy even? I think the issue i'm having is everyone assuming that a map has to be 5 worthy to get a feature and that's just not true. I love when reviewers submit maps that are not 5 worthy but offer something else, like the previous feature which was unfortunately delisted. I mean teaching a little numa history with the feature tool is awesome, and I love that we have that feature here, and you guys just make it suck with your moaning and complaining all the time. If you didn't submit the feature, we don't care what you think about the feature itself. We care about the maps and this community is losing it's focus because of stupid comments like yours.
Play the map, talk about the map. Stop talking about the feature, that's what what they are there for.
I mean you are willing to give the map a 4 right, so what makes it not feature worthy even? I think the issue i'm having is everyone assuming that a map has to be 5 worthy to get a feature and that's just not true. I love when reviewers submit maps that are not 5 worthy but offer something else, like the previous feature which was unfortunately delisted. I mean teaching a little numa history with the feature tool is awesome, and I love that we have that feature here, and you guys just make it suck with your moaning and complaining all the time. If you didn't submit the feature, we don't care what you think about the feature itself. We care about the maps and this community is losing it's focus because of stupid comments like yours.
Play the map, talk about the map. Stop talking about the feature, that's what what they are there for.
2009-03-14
@Maximo
I don't understand what you're saying.
I'm just saying that I wouldn't have featured this if I was a reviewer. However I'm not, so I don't have that power, and someone who is a reviewer liked this map enough for them to feature it.
You obviously didn't read my post carefully enough since you haven't included in your quote the "imo" directly afterwards, which stands for "in my opinion", in case you didn't know. It's an opinion, I expressed it, and I fail to see your problem with that. End of.
I'm just saying that I wouldn't have featured this if I was a reviewer. However I'm not, so I don't have that power, and someone who is a reviewer liked this map enough for them to feature it.
You obviously didn't read my post carefully enough since you haven't included in your quote the "imo" directly afterwards, which stands for "in my opinion", in case you didn't know. It's an opinion, I expressed it, and I fail to see your problem with that. End of.
2009-03-14
Sub-1000 AGD
There we go. Should be easy enough to beat.
Demo Data |
---|
2009-03-14
@chesemonger
Quote: "...but not quite good enough to warrant a feature..."
Do you people ever learn?
Do you people ever learn?
2009-03-14
Faster AGD
going for sub-1000 then I'll stop.
Demo Data |
---|
2009-03-14
Hmm...
Very addictive but not quite good enough to warrant a feature, IMO. Still, not my decision, and it's certainly not a bad map by any means.
4
4
2009-03-14
Great map great feature
but when I first saw it I thought it was a kra with the bottom right rocket to get the door key that would have been awesome. Still had a lot of fun and very nicely made
2009-03-14
It was really fun.
Make more maps please, mrgy.
2009-03-14
Congrats, mrgy05
Make more maps plz.
2009-01-28
Incredible
Just incredible. Faved for future reference.
2009-01-28
O_o
are you an angry sheep?
mrgy05
Thanks most of you for the comments and ratings
Maybe I will submit a good 'ol fashion N-Art when I get some freetime after this semester is over in May.