Vendors
Comments
2011-05-28
No
This is really bad. It feels like this map hasn't been playtested at all, as you seem to have just placed tiles and objects at random regardless of whether they form an entertaining map, or even just a pretty one. The mine-gold chain idea looks like it could have been an interesting idea, but otherwise I can't find any redeeming features to this map at all.
I'd disregard what 1211 said as well, there is no general rule for gold placement.
I'd disregard what 1211 said as well, there is no general rule for gold placement.
2011-05-28
well
the stylish objects placement are not someone new.
the stylish tileset are not someone new.
the stylish jumps are not someone new.
the mechanics (doors/golds/mines/switchs) are not someone new.
the stylish thwumps idea are not someone new.
the mouvement (falls and breaks) around this stylish area are not someone new.
Clearly this is a very good map.
BUT laissez_faire JUST MADE A COMMENT AND YOU HAVE NOT BEEN NICE TO HIM. THIS IS NOT GOOD
the stylish tileset are not someone new.
the stylish jumps are not someone new.
the mechanics (doors/golds/mines/switchs) are not someone new.
the stylish thwumps idea are not someone new.
the mouvement (falls and breaks) around this stylish area are not someone new.
Clearly this is a very good map.
BUT laissez_faire JUST MADE A COMMENT AND YOU HAVE NOT BEEN NICE TO HIM. THIS IS NOT GOOD
1211
Sen