Maybe a feature wasn't the right way to get my point across, and I'll admit that. I mean, it's more of a declaritive statement on my part than a review. But there's seriously some stuff you've got to consider here.

> I'm the one who's written over twenty quality reviews on NUMA, so I think I have enough experience and judgement to decide whether something like this is necessary or not. I thought it was, and if someone else thinks it's not, that's their opinion. They didn't feature it, so they're entitled to their opinion.
> I'm part of the team that's deciding which reviewers actually get through to take my place, so don't give me any shit about me taking up space for other reviewers. If anyone else wanted to submit something, they'd have done it already.
> I'm still pretty pleased with my choice; I liked this dda because it was different from the others imo whilst still maintaining a high standard of gameplay. I thought that someone developing a motif rather than just leaving tracks of objects was something to be praised.
> At the least this is a damn sight better than that "Diana Car Crash" thing godeNator did ages ago. :P

Likewise, everyone makes mistakes occasionally. o_O

Uh oh..

I'm sorry I wasn't more clear on this GHM - I shouldn't have sugar-coated my comment - that could've been a bit misleading.. So here goes:

This is an abysmal feature. If I were atob I would probably go as far as revoking your Reviewer Status. I believe that if you or indeed anyone who submitted this tripe as a trial submission; it would have gone straight to the junk folder. There are many willing members who want to review quality playable maps, including me, who want to choose maps that will be etched in a player's memory for a long time. To me, this map is like porn - You can enjoy it once then you forget about it. - ska [nmaps.net]

That's not what made this stand out for me. But yeah, sorry about this. Featuring was probably not the solution to my problem. ;)

if anyone deserves to have a DDA map featured, it's Clifty. This can't come close to most of his DDA, nreality or not.

Sorry, this is just something personal that got my goat a bit. I wasn't featuring a dda just for the sake of it, I just thought it was a step in the right direction from what I think has been a stagnation.

But whatever, I'll get back to normal reviews soon. That, and the grammar was bad too D:

What a dumb feature.

not supossed to be featured.. now thats the tranges part... not the walking through walls, or teh phantom lasers... the scary part is that this, a DDA, is a feature =D

What was this story that this DDA supposedly lorded over every other? Frankly I found it to be laggy and just as boring as you claimed it wouldn't be. If you simply have to feature a DDA why not give clifty some modern day exposure?

I still hate DDAs.

reviews trash other maps in addition to praising the map being featured. It's enough to talk about the good qualities of the map. There's no need to go hatin' everything other map by default, and in this case the people who play them, too.

Nice feature.

Only the "is" was meant to be bold...nvm
Sorry for double post

Finally, a LordofPeanuts Feature! Good on you, GTM!
Oh, and shut up teraza. It obviously is feature-worthy, as it's been featured...
I won't rate this, since I did it on my old account.
Oh, and holy crap I just got 0th on nreality! W00t!

;D

:)

I remember this!

for some reason... watching this DDA again a couple of months later doesn't appeal to me as much as it did the first time... While featuring a map of such a genre is bound to attract criticism; I admire your bravery/stupidity.. I'll leave that deliberation to the masses.

amazing dda, alot going on though but it works and makes it a very cleaver map :)

this isn't feature worthy

The dda's been stagnating as a genre for too long, imo. People think they can just add loads of enemies and make something new, whilst it's actually been done thousands of times before.

This is a reminder that, when ddas are given the same foreshadowing as action maps, the results are often fantastic. I'll try and make a dda following this philosphy as well.

that still doesnt help me =/

Nice1

.

Demo Data	63:35791394|17834530|17895697|17895697|17895697|17895697|17895697|17895697|89985297|0

do the chainguns...
They're just there for looks, like the chainguns provide close calls. It would still function without them, but it wouldn't be as cool.
5aved

Why bother with the ghost drones? They don't really contribute anything. =\

A dda that, not only has engaging action, but an actual theme, some nice construction and a little foresight. 4aved.

dda! I like people who can make a dda with style and chaingun drones;) 5/5

cool. Like the ghost drone effect too.

5

like icing

It even looks pretty!

Lordofpeanuts masterpiece, 5aved

they're very fun to watch

Demo Data	886:0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0

The ghost drones didn't do that much, but they added a nice effect.

It seemed the ghost drones didn't do much, but the close calls were great. 4.5 up/faved.

Cheated demo.

Demo Data	64:35808878|34|17891328|17895697|17895697|17895697|17895697|17895697|17895697|1

I called it N Massacre...

whos stacy...?

ive been gone for a bit and somehow massive randomness has ensude numa and i need colaboration to excess the situation (the long words help the situation =P )

nice map

4/5