Command Post
Other maps by this author
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Crowning Glory | Thwump Engineering Factory | Room Full of Mirrors | Holy Disorder | Gauntlet I | Dark Fantasy |
Comments
Pages: (0)
2008-12-23
Hey furry_ant.
astheoceansblue wrote an article on map making. You should read it here. [forum.therealn.com]
2008-12-23
Told ya so
2008-12-23
looks like
a monkey (right) and rhino (left) to me
2008-12-22
Ratings these days don't go down too well.
I've seen way too many fives and even fours given out, and it seems the average rating that is given out is a 4. If you look at the ratings, a rating of 2.5 is average as it is between better than and worse than average, so the average rating given out should be a 2 or 3.
To me this map would be rated a 1.5 on the old system as it is not very poor, but it is more than below average. However, we don't have that these days so I will be rating a 1. If you are disappointed with that, you shouldn't be as you are still learning the nuances of NED. Keep trying, and listen to the advice people give and you will make better and better maps.
To me this map would be rated a 1.5 on the old system as it is not very poor, but it is more than below average. However, we don't have that these days so I will be rating a 1. If you are disappointed with that, you shouldn't be as you are still learning the nuances of NED. Keep trying, and listen to the advice people give and you will make better and better maps.
2008-12-22
It wasnt spam
Random E tiles, thought obviously went into making this. I'd only constitute this as a 1 if at least 2 of those criteria are filled. Therefore, I gave it a 2.
2008-12-22
thanks gtm
well it was a noob map that didn't go so well apparently :}
2008-12-22
Imo
It was a noob map that went well.
2008-12-22
yes
and I don't think that is correct too, but this map is below average, or even worse. Certainly not better.
imo, ofcourse.
imo, ofcourse.
2008-12-22
ok
thats your view, crescor.
so lower than 2?
you really think this map is so shit it deserves a 0 or 1?
i know this isn't a really good map but i've seen far worse maps go for higher than 0 or 1.
so lower than 2?
you really think this map is so shit it deserves a 0 or 1?
i know this isn't a really good map but i've seen far worse maps go for higher than 0 or 1.
2008-12-22
[]
"I didn't say the tiles were great; I said they were better than average"
-Better then average = great...
"this map should never get a 5, but surely better than a 2. "
-No, probably even lower, I think.
-Better then average = great...
"this map should never get a 5, but surely better than a 2. "
-No, probably even lower, I think.
2008-12-22
Thank you
I should've never given it a 5, but it got a 3 in the end, so everything's fine :P
2008-12-22
thanks
to maxson and guitar hero matt for some positive comments. and crescor, i can agree that the gold placement is a bit thoughtless though the mines were not as thoughtless as they were supposed to kill you if you came off the bounce blocks in the wrong way.
this map should never get a 5, but surely better than a 2.
this map should never get a 5, but surely better than a 2.
2008-12-22
.
- I didn't say the tiles were great; I said they were better than average
- I can agree about the mines and the gold
- I didn't find the rockets to be useless at all; they did kill me on my first run, because I made a mistake, and that's when you should be killed
- I didn't notice that it was cheatable; furry should have placed the door further away and extended the tiles. But I think one door would've been uglier than two in this case, because it would just jut up from the ground and not connect to the top.
After all this, I would give it a 3.5, not 4.5, if I hadn't already rated. Besides, the average rating is 3; I think that's fairly appropriate.
- I can agree about the mines and the gold
- I didn't find the rockets to be useless at all; they did kill me on my first run, because I made a mistake, and that's when you should be killed
- I didn't notice that it was cheatable; furry should have placed the door further away and extended the tiles. But I think one door would've been uglier than two in this case, because it would just jut up from the ground and not connect to the top.
After all this, I would give it a 3.5, not 4.5, if I hadn't already rated. Besides, the average rating is 3; I think that's fairly appropriate.
2008-12-22
what is so flawless about this?
i dont get it. i didnt like the gold placement, and the thwumps were pretty unnessecary imo, so 2.5^
2008-12-22
Ha
if you mean too high, then probably yes.
The tiles were as average as can be. Tell me one great thing in them and prove me wrong.
The mines were extremely useless.
The gold was placed very ugly, and shouldn't be in the tiles.
The rockets were absolutely useless. I played this map 10 times, and didn't die once because of them. They also didn't provide any action.
The doors were ugly, don't use double doors. Plus they were useless, as you can see in my demo.
2 is fucked up, you say?
The tiles were as average as can be. Tell me one great thing in them and prove me wrong.
The mines were extremely useless.
The gold was placed very ugly, and shouldn't be in the tiles.
The rockets were absolutely useless. I played this map 10 times, and didn't die once because of them. They also didn't provide any action.
The doors were ugly, don't use double doors. Plus they were useless, as you can see in my demo.
2 is fucked up, you say?
| Demo Data |
|---|
2008-12-22
Considering everything
This was actually pretty fun to run through, if certainly with mistakes. Despite all, it was pretty solid, so I'll give it a 2.5
I had a lot of fun playing this level. I think a rating of 2 is pretty "fucked up" also :/
2008-12-22
5???????????
geesh..., some fucked up ratings these days...
2008-12-22
I didn't think it was thoughtless at all
The gausses probably could've been done a little better though. And the tiles were much better than average imo. 4.5^
PNI
Faster